ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the characteristics, treatments and 6-month functional outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) versus non-COVID-19 viral pneumonitis supported by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Design: Prospective, observational cohort study in seven intensive care units (ICUs) across Australia. Participants: Patients admitted to participating ICUs with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 or viral pneumonitis requiring VV-ECMO. Results: From 30 March 2019 to 31 December 2020, 13 patients were initiated on VV-ECMO for COVID-19 and 23 were initiated for non-COVID-19 viral pneumonitis. Patients with COVID-19 were older and had a longer duration from intubation to ECMO initiation, but had similar illness severity and APACHE IV scores at the time of initiation. Overall disability, health-related quality of life, and mortality were similar, but ICU and hospital length of stay were significantly longer in patients with COVID-19. Conclusions: Six-month functional outcomes and mortality were similar between COVID-19 and viral pneumonitis patients treated with VV-ECMO. However, length of stay was longer in COVID-19 patients, which may have resource implications.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To assess the performance of the UK International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium (ISARIC) Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium (4C) Mortality Score for predicting mortality in Australian patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Design: Multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study. Setting: 78 Australian ICUs participating in the SPRINT-SARI (Short Period Incidence Study of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection) Australia study of COVID-19. Participants: Patients aged 16 years or older admitted to participating Australian ICUs with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)confirmed COVID-19 between 27 February and 10 October 2020. Main outcome measures: ISARIC-4C Mortality Score, calculated at the time of ICU admission. The primary outcome was observed versus predicted in-hospital mortality (by 4C Mortality and APACHE II). Results: 461 patients admitted to a participating ICU were included. 149 (32%) had complete data to calculate a 4C Mortality Score without imputation. Overall, 61/461 patients (13.2%) died, 16.9% lower than the comparable ISARIC-4C cohort in the United Kingdom. In patients with complete data, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) 4C Mortality Score was 10.0 (IQR, 8.0-13.0) and the observed mortality was 16.1% (24/149) versus 22.9% median predicted risk of death. The 4C Mortality Score discriminatory performance measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.68-0.90), similar to its performance in the original ISARIC-4C UK cohort (0.77) and not superior to APACHE II (AUROC, 0.81;95% CI, 0.75-0.87). Conclusions: When calculated at the time of ICU admission, the 4C Mortality Score consistently overestimated the risk of death for Australian ICU patients with COVID-19. The 4C Mortality Score may need to be individually recalibrated for use outside the UK and in different hospital settings. Crit Care Resusc 2021;23 (4): 403-13
ABSTRACT
Objective: To report longitudinal differences in baseline characteristics, treatment, and outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Australia. Design, setting and participants: SPRINT-SARI Australia is a multicentre, inception cohort study enrolling adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to participating ICUs. The first wave of COVID-19 was from 27 February to 30 June 2020, and the second wave was from 1 July to 22 October 2020. Results: A total of 461 patients were recruited in 53 ICUs across Australia;a higher number were admitted to the ICU during the second wave compared with the first: 255 (55.3%) versus 206 (44.7%). Patients admitted to the ICU in the second wave were younger (58.0 v 64.0 years;P = 0.001) and less commonly male (68.9% v 60.0%;P = 0.045), although Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores were similar (14 v 14;P = 0.998). High flow oxygen use (75.2% v 43.4%;P < 0.001) and non-invasive ventilation (16.5% v 7.1%;P = 0.002) were more common in the second wave, as was steroid use (95.0% v 30.3%;P < 0.001). ICU length of stay was shorter (6.0 v 8.4 days;P = 0.003). In-hospital mortality was similar (12.2% v 14.6%;P = 0.452), but observed mortality decreased over time and patients were more likely to be discharged alive earlier in their ICU admission (hazard ratio, 1.43;95% CI, 1.13–1.79;P = 0.002). Conclusion: During the second wave of COVID-19 in Australia, ICU length of stay and observed mortality decreased over time. Multiple factors were associated with this, including changes in clinical management, the adoption of new evidence-based treatments, and changes in patient demographic characteristics but not illness severity. © 2021, College of Intensive Care Medicine. All rights reserved.